17/02 08:15AM skype call
In this call these points were discussed:
- Research validity- the validity of sources and how can you tell if a source is just opinion or fact? This raised the topic of the ethics of Web 2.0 and who decides what is right? the point was brought up that everything is down to perspective and what could be a useful and a truthful source for one person may not be for another due to how personal this course is and how subjective information on web 2.0 is. Cross reference and looking up other sources that are on the same topic can help clarify whether what is being said is more factual or an opinion. It can still be hard to know 100%, but it can provide some confidence and an avenue for discussion and mindful comparison with your own experiences and opinions. The relationship you have with the information is important, as there are different realities for different people, so don't get too hung up on proving a point during this course.
- Methodology vs Methods- methodology is the approach to research. Qualitative is what we will be using in this course and is "connected with what something is like or how good it is, rather than with how much of it there is" (oxford learners dictionaries, 2021). Whereas Quantitative "relates to information that can be shown in numbers and amounts" (Cambridge Business English dictionary, 2021). Methods are how you are going to go about the research to collect the data within that approach. For example these can be an interview, survey, observation etc.
- Literature Review - in this I think we are collating lots of different sources and stating what they say. From my understanding, I could be wrong, but in this we can include information that we initially looked at and could possibly contradict the topic of enquiry we are doing now. For the layout the first section could be about the literature you have used to find more out about your enquiry topic. The second section could then be about the methods and methodology that you will use, finding literature around those methods. I think we only look into the methods that we would like to use, but again i may be wrong.
- Research help- some tips for researching are:
- if struggling to find information you can: type in key words, look at the contents pages, and chapters to find relevant sections of books. Use google scholar, the reading lists and other blogs references to source relevant articles/ books that may be of help. However, if you struggle to get into a book, a great tip that i had never really thought of (and can't remember who said sorry!) was don't be afraid to 'write off' a book. If it is not engaging you, possibly find the main aim of the book and try and find other material on it that may be more interesting/ easy to understand and consequently more useful. Ted talks, podcasts, and videos can be a more engaging way of learning. Journal articles too can be more to the point, and I too find these useful at present when learning.
-its important to remember throughout this course we are not trying to prove a point, but instead to discuss what we have found out and evaluate the affects this has on certain topics.
- Artefacts- there are many different ways to present one. Some ideas are videos with a voice over, a piece of choreography, a collage, 3D model. Each way is different, so there isn't really a wrong answer as long as you get the information you want across without really using too many words. It is tempting to keep adding to your artefact, but I actually found that less can sometimes be more as its all down to interpretation. My artefact for module one was an A3 drawing that represented my practice. It was a visual map of my essay I had written, so I found it helpful to do my artefact at the very end of the module in the last week and a half, which was a little stressful but I felt a better way of doing it. I wrote a short statement explaining why I chose to do my artefact in this way and what certain images represent to me. I thought it was important to clarify what I was trying to get across because all art is subjective and means slightly different things to what other people think. It also doesn't matter about how well the artefact is done, its what it represents that's important.
hope this helps a little!
references
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/quantitative
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/qualitative
Hi Katie, Great blog post! I found this morning's call really helpful and everything you have mentioned above makes perfect sense to me. I'm looking forward to reading more of your posts. x
ReplyDeleteHi Katie, thanks for your post. I'm currently on module 3 and can relate to the point that you're at at them moment. I found in module 2 that there were so many different pieces of the portfolio to bring together that I didn't really get to grips with my literature review until later in the process which became quite stressful. I'm focusing on perfectionism within dancers and found a lot of literature on this topic, both positives and negatives, however broadening my research to 'what is perfect?', perfectionism in religion or imperfections within fashion trends allowed me to better shape my inquiry proposal.
ReplyDeleteAlex
Hi Katie, great notes on yesterdays session (they're much better than mine). I often become too engrossed in listening and forget to take notes. I found it so helpful hearing about how we should review literature, as well as knowing what is reliable and what isn't. There are really important notes to remember as we proceed with the rest of this course. Thank you for sharing x
ReplyDeleteThese are exactly the notes I needed! I felt like I wrote so much down and then coming back too it well chicken scratch would be a compliment to what I actually produced! You've really managed to summarise the call and include all the points which is really helpful! Thanks for sharing x
ReplyDeleteHi Katie,
ReplyDeletesorry I've only just got round to reading your blog. As I was looking for more people's blogs based on the structure of the essay and kind of trying to refresh myself as I've not been able to see the woods for the trees! When reading the handbook over and over I seem to get bogged down with the whole ting being daunting that I lose focus on the basics. This blog has really helped me to reassess and have a clearer image of what my aim is! So thank you for that.
I think the part of your blog that has been most helpful to me is your breakdown of the literature review - this is the part that I still feel unsure about...exactly what is it we are saying there!?
Also I think I need to be more aware of this issue too -
"the validity of sources and how can you tell if a source is just opinion or fact? This raised the topic of the ethics of Web 2.0 and who decides what is right? " This is also an area I need to take into consideration so thank you for making a note of that!
Great blog Katie - thank you.
I wrote a blog after the writing workshop which you may also find useful in terms of physically structuring a piece of academic writing. If you have time, take a look and tell me what you think.
https://laurenslater-klein.blogspot.com/2021/03/writing-with-peter-thomas-locate.html
All the best with your work, Lauren x